Talk:Annales des Maladies de la Peau et de la Syphilis
This article was nominated for merging with Pierre Louis Alphée Cazenave on 2023-10-18. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was No consensus. |
A fact from Annales des Maladies de la Peau et de la Syphilis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 October 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 11:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
- ... that the founder of Annales des Maladies de la Peau et de la Syphilis claimed to have inoculated himself with syphilis? Source: Alphée Cazenave, ... infected himself with pus drawn from a symptom of syphilis received little attention...[1]
- Reviewed: Yellow sticker
Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 17:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Annales des Maladies de la Peau et de la Syphilis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: QPQ hasn't yet been done, article appears ineligible since it was not nommed within a timely manner. Earwig looks good and page is well written. Hook is interesting a cited properly. I gave the supplimentary rules a good read through, particularly D9 (newness IAR): The "seven days old" limit can be extended for a day or two upon request.
, I feel as though you'd probably ask for leniency, and I'm more than happy to accommodate, just please the the QPQ in sooner than later. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 04:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Etriusus:... Thank you. QPQ added. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- DYK reviewed, passed. 🏵️Etrius ( Us) 10:31, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- On hold. Article has been tagged for possible merge. Cielquiparle (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- I closed the merge discussion as no consensus, so I'm readding the green tick here per the previous review. Z1720 (talk) 15:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)